Off-Topic: Consensus

Lake Martin Topics

(Lake Martin Specific)

111,168 messages

Updated 5/22/2024 5:12:15 PM

Off-Topic

Lakes Online Forum

83,631 messages

Updated 5/23/2024 1:10:37 PM

Boat Maintenance

Lakes Online Forum

5,193 messages

Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM

Lake Martin Fishing

(Lake Martin Specific)

4,169 messages

Updated 4/16/2024 3:16:57 AM

Jokes

Lakes Online Forum

4,169 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM

Sports

Lakes Online Forum

4,260 messages

Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM

Grilling & Recipes

Lakes Online Forum

2,976 messages

Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM

Lake Martin SCUBA

(Lake Martin Specific)

169 messages

Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM

Tallapoosa River Topics

Lakes Online Forum

98 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM

Forum Usage Rules

Welcome, Guest

Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]

	Name:	MAJ USA RET -
	Subject:	Consensus
	Date:	11/23/2009 7:07:27 PM

If, in open scientific (as opposed to political) debate the concept of AGW is successfully defended and independently verified, I will subscribe to a well conceived plan to mitigate the condition. Way back in high school chemistry I learned about a couple of very important, well known characteristics of CO2 which cause me to be very suspect that the gas in anyway a cause of global warming.

BUT, I reserve the right to be smarter today than I was yesterday. Debate me; give me your data and your models. If the data and model(s) are valid and reliable, and my colleagues and I can independently recreate your experiment… confirm your hypothesis… I will join the AGW team.

Why do I hear the chirping of crickets?