Off-Topic: Supreme Court Nominee
(Lake Martin Specific)
111,170 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 5:46:58 PM
Lakes Online Forum
83,644 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 9:14:08 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,170 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 5:21:13 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Yankee06
|
Subject:
|
Supreme Court Nominee
|
Date:
|
5/12/2010 6:21:46 PM
|
|
-Geeeeez Lot, lately you've been posting a lot ! - OK, most of your posts are interesting questions. ...like this one. -My take would be the WH is out-of-line pressuring CBS to "retract" that part of its story. -However, I would be fine with teh WH "criticizing" CBS for printing something untrue, or suggesting something was true by innuendo, if it were untrue in fact. -In this day, let kagan speak for herself. ANyone accepting the nomination for supreme court justice should expect that their sexual preferences, as well as their favorite colors, will be topics open for question. With Sotomayor the question was would her latinoness effect her views on issues effecting latinos and other minorities. If Kagan is gay, then it is equally fair I suppose that the question will be will her gayness effect her views on issues effecting gays. -Geeeez, teh dems are the rainbow party, why can't they talk about being gay.
|
|