Off-Topic: Wikileaks

Lake Martin Topics

(Lake Martin Specific)

111,183 messages

Updated 6/9/2024 1:00:09 PM

Off-Topic

Lakes Online Forum

83,677 messages

Updated 6/15/2024 9:40:12 AM

Boat Maintenance

Lakes Online Forum

5,197 messages

Updated 6/10/2024 5:39:11 AM

Lake Martin Fishing

(Lake Martin Specific)

4,171 messages

Updated 5/29/2024 10:51:34 PM

Jokes

Lakes Online Forum

4,170 messages

Updated 6/10/2024 6:29:37 PM

Sports

Lakes Online Forum

4,261 messages

Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM

Grilling & Recipes

Lakes Online Forum

2,977 messages

Updated 6/10/2024 6:30:23 PM

Lake Martin SCUBA

(Lake Martin Specific)

169 messages

Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM

Tallapoosa River Topics

Lakes Online Forum

98 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM

Forum Usage Rules

Welcome, Guest

Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]

	Name:	comrade
	Subject:	Wikileaks
	Date:	10/24/2010 11:53:21 AM

So back to the question: do you think that a disgruntled employee of the US government made this information available with intent to hurt the US government/military, and did so in an independent fashion (that is, without regard to the governing Party)? Or did a third party, with a more focused agenda, direct the availability of the information?
Sounds like Tallulahound would vote for number 1, and dismiss number 2. Correct?