Off-Topic: Answer the question
(Lake Martin Specific)
111,232 messages
Updated 10/28/2024 2:46:13 PM
Lakes Online Forum
84,070 messages
Updated 10/30/2024 8:48:25 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,171 messages
Updated 5/29/2024 10:51:34 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,172 messages
Updated 9/9/2024 5:04:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
CRD
-
|
Subject:
|
Answer the question
|
Date:
|
2/1/2021 5:28:49 PM (updated 2/1/2021 5:36:00 PM)
|
|
Your simplistic requests for yes or no answers regarding any healthcare statement is an insult to me. Always has been. In order to critique an organization's position statement, typically I would analyze the statement as we often did as residents in Journal Club, via a PUBMED lit review of references. It is a worthwhile and time consuming process, however, it allows one to verify the veracity of conclusions reached regarding a certain hypothesis. One can find any non peered review article to support their case. The MSM has this down pat. Putting time and effort in the analysis and references certainly adds weight to an opinion. Your layperson analysis of a position statement is infantile (to be expected because you have no healthcare experience) and the answers you seek worthless to those of us who think (read academically) differently than you. I respond to certain questions you ask when they intrique me, certainly few and far between.
|
|