Name:   CRD - Subject:   Wrap it up Date:   3/23/2021 4:33:10 PM (updated 3/23/2021 4:35:08 PM)

As I have said Archie, knowing that you are an absolute lockdown, double mask, extreme social distancing, restrictive mitigation proponent, despite recent studies that show that new anger, post traumatic stress and severe anxiety and depression are linked to these protocols, I can see where you have come off the tracks.  If I thought that my risk was 2% across the board, I too may consider adjusting my behaviour to some extent.  I don't base my behaviour on the Archie Ratio for reasons previously stated.   You have not convinced me or anyone else on this forum to do so.  What you fail to understand is that although all cases are infections, not all infections are cases.   

Studies like the one I first referenced in this thread are meant to show that the Infection Fatality Rate, not the Archie Ratio,  is a more useful and accurate #  in order justify and expedite an across-the-board end to restrictive mitigating measures, which should be the end goal, should it not?