Name:   MartiniMan - Subject:   Weak as weak could be..... Date:   3/24/2021 1:56:31 PM

If you had done what you claimed the quote would have been as follows.

"Lawyers for pro-Trump attorney Sidney Powell said that "no reasonable person" would believe that her false conspiracies about the 2020 election were "truly statements of fact.""  Someone had to remove the interior quotes.  Was it you Goofy?

As for Sydney Powell I will say the same thing I said when she was making these claims, she either has the goods or is crazy to make them as it will kill her reputation.  Since not one court case has been decided on the merits I have no idea which is the case.  But as Jonathon Turley, liberal law professor, rightly pointed out this is a very sound and logical argument to make for dismissal of the lawsuit.  It literally has zero to do with the merits of her case and is a tactical argument.

Whether she can deliver on her claims remains to be seen.  One would think she would relish discovery but as someone that has been through discovery knows, it is by far the most expensive aspect of litigation.  Mike Lindell may have the financial resources to pay for discovery and Powell may not.  I don't know and neither do you.

So an honest, sane person would simply delete the original post and save themselves the humiliation.  But noooooo.....Goofy has to double down with some lame excuse.  So who removed the interior quotes Goofy?  Who made the claim that this was what Powell's attorneys said?  Grab a mirror if you need help with the answer.