Off-Topic: Scientifically illiterate non sequiter
(Lake Martin Specific)
111,170 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 5:46:58 PM
Lakes Online Forum
83,644 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 9:14:08 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,170 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 5:21:13 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
MartiniMan
-
|
Subject:
|
Scientifically illiterate non sequiter
|
Date:
|
3/7/2022 3:00:31 PM
|
|
Goofy, unless you have been under a rock you may have missed the little factoid that the faux vaccines do not prevent transmission of the virus. At best it may lessen symptoms but even that with the latest variant is not certain. So no, that article does not even remotely make the case for getting the experimental gene therapies. Literally the only reason to take a chance on them is if you are elderly and/or have two more comorbidities....and I suspect the vast majority of them already have the jab. But it will not prevent you from being infected and if you get infected you will still risk the issues raised in the article.
So YOUR CHOICE is whether the risk of adverse reactions from the experimental gene therapies, knowing they won't protect you from infection, is worth the reduced potential for hospitalization and death from the ChiCom virus. If you are not elderly, obese, immunocompromised, etc. in my opinion you are crazy to take the risk. But it's a free country so knock yourself out.....but taking advice from someone as scientifically illiterate and ill-informed (or intentionally misleading) as Goofy without at least thinking critically is indeed a BAD CHOICE.
|
|