Boat Maintenance: Another good point
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
4,313 messages
Updated 5/7/2024 1:43:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,627 messages
Updated 5/20/2024 12:16:20 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
126 messages
Updated 12/23/2022 9:21:15 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Logan Martin Lake Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   Ulysses E. McGill The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   Another good point
Date:   7/29/2010 5:37:13 PM

and it made me think of some other things from when I was shopping last fall.

Ride and handling are also greatly influenced by whats under the boat such as # of toons, shape of the toons, and performance packages attached to the toons.  My experience is a loaded up pontoon will usually have less bounce than a lighter one with all other things being equal (which is probably what you felt when you did a test drive). The performance packages that Premier, Bennington, and Manitou (there may be others but those are what I tested with such packages)  have developed are amazing when it comes to ride and handling.  I also test drove a new Harris because other than being loud and slow I liked my old one.  Also, I really like the Harris interior......but  the handling was not competitive with the other brands I listed above. My guess is that all manufacturers will have a high performance package within the next few years. I think Manitou set the standard, Premier and Bennington reacted, and other companies will also want to compete in the high performance market.

If looking at pontoons (new or used), I personally would only consider tritoons that at least have lifting strakes.... and as I stated above, I personally will never go the I/O route again for the reasons you mentioned.
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
Outboard engine vs. Inboard/Outboard… - Mack - 7/26/2010 7:03:49 PM
     Outboard engine vs. Inboard/Outboard… - Maverick - 7/26/2010 7:53:50 PM
          Outboard engine vs. Inboard/Outboard… - Nancy Christine II - 7/26/2010 10:05:46 PM
               Outboard engine vs. Inboard/Outboard… - houseboat - 7/27/2010 8:51:26 AM
                    Outboard engine vs. Inboard/Outboard… - houseboat - 7/30/2010 8:57:45 AM
          I agree with Mav - Ulysses E. McGill - 7/28/2010 2:29:48 AM
     Outboard engine vs. Inboard/Outboard… - greycove - 7/27/2010 12:28:54 PM
     Outboard engine vs. Inboard/Outboard… - CAT BOAT - 7/27/2010 3:30:47 PM
          So Cat?? - Mack - 7/27/2010 6:47:02 PM
               So Cat?? - CAT BOAT - 7/27/2010 10:04:18 PM
                    V-6 in a Pontoon? - BamaDave - 7/28/2010 12:19:44 AM
               So Cat?? - Ulysses E. McGill - 7/28/2010 2:22:04 AM
                    So Cat?? - NautiqueFrk - 7/28/2010 8:06:01 PM
                         good point (sorta) - Ulysses E. McGill - 7/28/2010 11:36:34 PM
     Outboard engine vs. Inboard/Outboard… - 250 SEL - 7/29/2010 8:25:11 AM
          Another good point - Ulysses E. McGill - 7/29/2010 5:37:13 PM
               Another good point - Psycho - 7/30/2010 12:55:35 PM
                    Another good point - Ulysses E. McGill - 7/30/2010 2:27:06 PM
                         Another good point - Psycho - 7/31/2010 3:37:52 PM
     Appreciate Your Opinions>>> - Mack - 8/2/2010 7:19:27 PM



Quick Links
Logan Martin Lake News
Logan Martin Lake Photos
Logan Martin Lake Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LoganMartin.info
THE LOGAN MARTIN LAKE WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal