Off-Topic: Did Obama stick it to BP?
(Weiss Lake Specific)
158 messages
Updated 7/2/2022 8:26:17 PM
Lakes Online Forum
83,644 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 9:14:08 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Weiss Lake Specific)
34 messages
Updated 9/15/2015 12:41:07 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Weiss Lake Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   water_watcher The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   Did Obama stick it to BP?
Date:   8/12/2010 7:14:15 PM

Let us take a closer look at the effect on BP's finances:  

1. BP will establish a $20 billion fund, but will pay only $7 billion into
it during 2010.  

2. BP is a British corporation, but has a very large operating entity in the
US but only about 30% of it's income is derived  from the US . 

3. By Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), BP must book the
entire $20 billion expense in the year accrued. Therefore, they will book a
$20 billion expense in 2010, reducing their US tax liability by $7 billion.

4. Our dear leader also convinced this massive corporation to show their
concern for the "small people" by withholding dividends to their
shareholders for the last 3 quarters of 2010.  This reduces their outward
cash flow by about $7.5 billion, including approximately 40% of that amount
to US citizens.  Assuming that the Bush tax cuts will survive through 2010,
the US Treasury will lose another $450 million in taxes on that amount.  We
won't even discuss the effect on the US economy.  

Let us put the results into a table easily understood by most people:  

BP Cash Flow:  

o Escrow funding ($7 billion)  

o Dividend saving $7.5 billion  

o Tax savings $7 billion  

o Net favorable cash flow : $7.5 billion  


US Treasury Tax Receipts:  

o BP Corporate income tax .... minus $7.5 billion  

o BP Shareholders ..... minus  $0.45 billion  

o Net unfavorable tax receipts ..... minus  $7.95 billion  

Oh yeah ... Obama really stuck it to BP (NOT) .... he once again stuck it to the US tax payer.  I guess we really should expect this.  After all, our dear leader is the
most inexperienced man in ANY room he enters. 

This is just one more reason why a 'community organizer' should NOT be
negotiating anything dealing with money and finances! 

Bottom line: The $20 Billion BP is putting up will create a $7.5 Billion
positive cash for BP flow this year.  But, Obama actually "thinks" he really
did something special and stuck it to them "kicked a $$" (his words). 

In reality, BP executives are laughing at him while they thank him for suck a great idea to cut their tax burden and improve cash flow.  
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
Did Obama stick it to BP? - water_watcher - 8/12/2010 7:14:15 PM
     Did Obama stick it to BP? - GoneFishin - 8/12/2010 8:54:46 PM
          Did Obama stick it to BP? - water_watcher - 8/12/2010 10:12:29 PM
          Did Obama stick it to BP? - water_watcher - 8/12/2010 10:18:32 PM
               Did Obama stick it to BP? - lotowner - 8/13/2010 8:33:50 AM
               Schedule M - Maverick - 8/13/2010 1:46:38 PM
                    Hey MAVERICK - GoneFishin - 8/13/2010 5:30:40 PM
                         Hey MAVERICK - Maverick - 8/13/2010 6:27:35 PM
                              Hey MAVERICK - water_watcher - 8/13/2010 9:23:07 PM
          Did Obama stick it to BP? - MartiniMan - 8/14/2010 9:00:07 AM



Quick Links
Weiss Lake News
Weiss Lake Photos
Weiss Lake Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LakeWeiss.info
THE WEISS LAKE WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal