Off-Topic: Lets test Hound's MBA

Lake Martin Topics

(Lake Martin Specific)

111,136 messages

Updated 4/17/2024 11:03:49 PM

Off-Topic

Lakes Online Forum

83,586 messages

Updated 4/16/2024 12:46:32 PM

Boat Maintenance

Lakes Online Forum

5,193 messages

Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM

Lake Martin Fishing

(Lake Martin Specific)

4,169 messages

Updated 4/16/2024 3:16:57 AM

Jokes

Lakes Online Forum

4,169 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM

Sports

Lakes Online Forum

4,260 messages

Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM

Grilling & Recipes

Lakes Online Forum

2,976 messages

Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM

Lake Martin SCUBA

(Lake Martin Specific)

169 messages

Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM

Tallapoosa River Topics

Lakes Online Forum

98 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM

Forum Usage Rules

Welcome, Guest

Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]

	Name:	lakngulf -
	Subject:	Lets test Hound's MBA
	Date:	5/10/2010 2:31:21 PM

I would want to know more information before doing anything, therefore my immediate reaction of "none of the above". For instance, did team 2 produce just one item that was perfect, therefore a 0% defect? And, did the other teams produce 100 each with 2 defects for each team, therefore the less than 3% defect?

The production of the other three teams might have been so much in excess of team 2 that other measures should be taken.

Also, don't JTC, like so many businesses do, on one month. The jump to conclusion syndrome is rampant where I work, and we make up things to count to determine production, but I digress.

None of the above is STILL the correct answer. Now after a few months or an year, and after considering other items than just defects, then we would be ready for some action.

For instance, I typed this fairly fast and more than likely have some defects. Team 2 might still be on the first paragraph, but with no defects.