Off-Topic: Ban The Ban Ban
(Lake Martin Specific)
111,105 messages
Updated 3/25/2024 4:43:57 PM
Lakes Online Forum
83,545 messages
Updated 3/28/2024 4:06:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,192 messages
Updated 3/26/2024 6:58:12 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,164 messages
Updated 3/27/2024 9:20:53 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,168 messages
Updated 2/23/2024 10:21:00 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
97 messages
Updated 6/7/2023 10:50:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
lakngulf
-
|
Subject:
|
Ban The Ban Ban
|
Date:
|
3/16/2017 9:42:09 AM
|
|
I am betwitxt and between on the travel slowdown. I think administrative actions can take care of most of what they are trying to do.
Also, if it is for 90 days to fix our vetting, perhaps we fix our vetting instead of issuing the ban.
But on a more important note: A judge CANNOT make a ruling with this reasoining.....
this is a religious ban, even though it explicity states otherwise.
this would be an ok ban if someone else was president.
I have to rule on this based on campaign rhetoric!
What????
|
|