Off-Topic: An article in todays Washington Post
(Lake Martin Specific)
111,166 messages
Updated 5/19/2024 10:40:32 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,626 messages
Updated 5/18/2024 5:07:20 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,169 messages
Updated 4/16/2024 3:16:57 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
MrHodja
-
|
Subject:
|
An article in todays Washington Post
|
Date:
|
1/16/2020 1:01:16 PM
|
|
It is the GAO, which is SUPPOSED to be a bipartisan group working for Congress. Seems that unless Congress put a "transfer immediately with NO delays for any reason" restriction on the President (rather than the end of the fiscal year) there might be a basis for the claim a law was broken. The thing I think they are focusing on is a staffer's claim that the reason for the holdback was to achieve a foreign policy goal. I don't know whether that is the case, or even if it is the case whether that is breaking a law. Seems like the GAO may be doing the biding of the House majority.
|
|