Logan Martin Lake Topics: For Jawjagal
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
4,313 messages
Updated 5/7/2024 1:43:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,630 messages
Updated 5/22/2024 10:56:34 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Logan Martin Lake Specific)
126 messages
Updated 12/23/2022 9:21:15 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Logan Martin Lake Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   LifeTime Laker The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   For Jawjagal
Date:   3/30/2006 10:50:22 AM

First off this is not a personal attack, just an attempt to bring another perspective the the recent issue of "big boats". I took the following from a post of yours back in February, the 15th I think, but it is on page 9. I was on one of my frequent breaks from the forum at the time, but went back just to do a little catch up.

"When I hear someone bought at the lake from, let's say, - Montgomery, I am comfortable. When I hear Atlanta, I question. (See my post on Destin....come in, sorta like rape the land, and then move on.....) I like the controlled growth of the lake forefathers....."

Those same "forefathers" are the same ones that are pushing the big boat ban because they have looked at other lakes around Atlanta and seen what uncontrolled "growth" will do the area. The growth ON the water is the same as the growth on the shores, they cant be seperated.

This is not personal. You seem like a very nice lady and I have no problem with you, or any of the others for that matter. I have benifitted more than you can imagine from the "growth" of late, but big boats are built for big water, open water. There were several others in that thread that basically expressed the same opinion as you, but you started the thread, so I focused on your message.

Once again, not personal. There are others that seem to be a little hypicritical on the issue. The control others, but not me crowd. Many of the ones affected by this 'ban' have no stake in this lake other than coming on weekends and using it as a playground. That is fine, but bring appropriate toys. I have personally witnessed a group of 6-8 of guys that pull up to a public ramp, launch their big, loud, expenisive 'cigarette' boats, thunder run the lake all day and then leave. Let them play elsewhere.

I hope to meet some of you guys this summer, but I don't get around to Sand Island that much anymore. I stay closer to home.
Sand Island
Point of Interest - Island
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
For Jawjagal - LifeTime Laker - 3/30/2006 10:50:22 AM
     For Jawjagal - jawjagal - 3/30/2006 8:38:31 PM
          For Jawjagal - LifeTime Laker - 3/31/2006 12:02:40 AM
               And BTW.... - LifeTime Laker - 3/31/2006 12:08:10 AM
                    Atlanta and Lake Martin - jawjagal - 3/31/2006 10:56:44 AM
                         And by the way - jawjagal - 3/31/2006 10:57:33 AM
                              And by the way - LifeTime Laker - 3/31/2006 10:23:47 PM



Quick Links
Logan Martin Lake News
Logan Martin Lake Photos
Logan Martin Lake Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LoganMartin.info
THE LOGAN MARTIN LAKE WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal