Lake Wedowee Topics: Boating Bill Editorial Comment
(Lake Wedowee Specific)
120 messages
Updated 2/27/2024 9:06:20 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,626 messages
Updated 5/18/2024 5:07:20 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,193 messages
Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM
(Lake Wedowee Specific)
3 messages
Updated 3/3/2021 9:41:57 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,169 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,260 messages
Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,976 messages
Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Lake Wedowee Photo Gallery
    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   Maverick The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   Boating Bill Editorial Comment
Date:   4/14/2006 12:22:15 PM

While I agree with the vast majority of your points the problem is that there are plenty of sub 26' 11 boats which can well exceed 100+ mphs.

There are actually numerous bass boats which can exceed 70+ mph.

What I am trying to get across is the size of the boat does not matter, and the only way to control speed is through limitations, as on our national highways, etc.

So this legislation really has not accomplished what it appears they where trying to do, which is reduce speed on our lakes. As I agree speed needs to be reduced, but the problem still remains the irresponsible vessel operators with the sub 26' 11" 100+ mph boat.

Again, just my thoughts on the matter and appreciate your feedback to the editorial.
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
Boating Bill Editorial Comment - Maverick - 4/14/2006 2:18:42 AM
     Boating Bill Editorial Comment - Carnac - 4/14/2006 5:02:41 AM
          Boating Bill Editorial Comment - Osms - 4/14/2006 8:11:53 AM
               OSMS - Maverick - 4/14/2006 12:44:32 PM
                    response to Maverick 2d - Osms - 4/14/2006 1:16:36 PM
                         response to Maverick 2d - Osms - 4/14/2006 1:25:29 PM
                              Thanks OSMS - Maverick - 4/14/2006 2:17:13 PM
                                   Thanks OSMS - Osms - 4/14/2006 4:00:21 PM
                                        Actually - Ulysses E. McGill - 4/15/2006 1:44:35 PM
                    A couple of questions... - WSMS - 4/14/2006 1:49:38 PM
                         WSMS - Maverick - 4/14/2006 2:13:30 PM
                         WSMS - Your Response ??? - Maverick - 4/15/2006 12:15:38 PM
                              WSMS - Your Response ??? - WSMS - 4/17/2006 7:30:52 PM
          Boating Bill Editorial Comment - Maverick - 4/14/2006 12:22:15 PM
               It isn't the end - Carnac - 4/14/2006 5:57:10 PM
                    It isn't the end - Maverick - 4/14/2006 7:30:44 PM
                         I think I heard on ch. 12.... - Osms - 4/14/2006 7:44:47 PM
                              I think I heard on ch. 12.... - BoatsRFun - 4/14/2006 9:30:39 PM
                         That's accurate - Carnac - 4/15/2006 8:14:37 AM
                              WSMS - Maverick - 4/15/2006 12:14:22 PM
                                   Sorry Meant Carnac Above - Maverick - 4/15/2006 12:17:25 PM
     Boating Bill Editorial Comment - LifeTime Laker - 4/14/2006 8:09:35 AM
          Boating Bill Editorial Comment - Maverick - 4/14/2006 12:45:45 PM
          Boating Bill Editorial Comment - eli - 4/14/2006 11:21:19 PM
     Boating Bill Editorial Comment - AnchorbayDon - 4/14/2006 9:22:09 AM
          Boating Bill Editorial Comment - luvlake - 4/14/2006 10:47:36 AM
          Boating Bill Editorial Comment - Maverick - 4/14/2006 12:48:44 PM
     Boating Bill Editorial Comment - eli - 4/14/2006 11:04:44 PM


Quick Links
Lake Wedowee News
Lake Wedowee Photos
Lake Wedowee Videos



About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LakeWedowee.info
THE LAKE WEDOWEE WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal