Off-Topic: Webmaster and rules:

Lake Martin Topics

(Lake Martin Specific)

111,163 messages

Updated 5/11/2024 6:02:40 PM

Off-Topic

Lakes Online Forum

83,623 messages

Updated 5/13/2024 10:35:33 PM

Boat Maintenance

Lakes Online Forum

5,193 messages

Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM

Lake Martin Fishing

(Lake Martin Specific)

4,169 messages

Updated 4/16/2024 3:16:57 AM

Jokes

Lakes Online Forum

4,169 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM

Sports

Lakes Online Forum

4,260 messages

Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM

Grilling & Recipes

Lakes Online Forum

2,976 messages

Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM

Lake Martin SCUBA

(Lake Martin Specific)

169 messages

Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM

Tallapoosa River Topics

Lakes Online Forum

98 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM

Forum Usage Rules

Welcome, Guest

Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]

	Name:	Swimmer27 -
	Subject:	Webmaster and rules:
	Date:	10/23/2008 4:03:48 PM

"Now read almost any post by Swimmer27 or water_watcher. If you can find one that doesn't have rudeness or personal attacks, congratulations, ,I bet you can't do it twice in a row. But supposedly that's breaking a rule."

You MUST be a democrat!! Only dems consider stating facts and pointintg to one's history as a "personal attack". Calling someone what 8 years of history has proven them to be is not an 'attack'. You will only find my posts 'attack' (as you call it) toward one person, and that person chose to send his wife out to fight his battle for him, so I choose point out the facts to her. She comes on here and chooses to make the same false claims that he made, then I have every right to set the record straight. Although in his most offending post he stated if he was wroing he would admint it. Within minutes he was corrected by a couple respected members, but suddenly that wasn't good enough. Only legal documents were proof enough for him. I even offered those up, but only with a wager. So far they refuse to take up the challenge. But that is typical of snivelling whiney little people like them. He posted lies about me. He was PROVEN worng, yet isn't man enough admit he was wrong. Only idiots and dems continue with the same arguments once proven wrong.

I can't speak for water watcher, nor do I have any desire too. I would like to meet him/her someday. I don't know who WW is,but I have been accused of being him on multiple occasions. Even some of my BFF's (Best Forum Friends) used to think we are one in the same, even after I told them I am not. Bruce knows the truth, but chooses not to get involved, as is his right. I do not post private emails but I did forward one to a trusted friend (who thought I was WW) recently that proved that I am NOT Water Watcher. Feb and hound choose to think anyone that disagrees with them is me. GOOD FOR THEM!! They have every right in the world to be wrong, as they prove themselves to be on a regular basis.