Off-Topic: President Obama

Lake Martin Topics

(Lake Martin Specific)

111,163 messages

Updated 5/11/2024 6:02:40 PM

Off-Topic

Lakes Online Forum

83,623 messages

Updated 5/13/2024 10:35:33 PM

Boat Maintenance

Lakes Online Forum

5,193 messages

Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM

Lake Martin Fishing

(Lake Martin Specific)

4,169 messages

Updated 4/16/2024 3:16:57 AM

Jokes

Lakes Online Forum

4,169 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM

Sports

Lakes Online Forum

4,260 messages

Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM

Grilling & Recipes

Lakes Online Forum

2,976 messages

Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM

Lake Martin SCUBA

(Lake Martin Specific)

169 messages

Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM

Tallapoosa River Topics

Lakes Online Forum

98 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM

Forum Usage Rules

Welcome, Guest

Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]

	Name:	Swimmer27 -
	Subject:	President Obama
	Date:	2/5/2009 11:10:42 AM

I am torn on this one. I see both sides of the argument but for the inequality of the enforcement. Does the cap only apply to the CEO. What about the CFO? COO? Company lawyer? The list goes on and on. What about the banks lobbyist?

What about Hollywood? There was TARP money for them also. So now do we cap actors at 500G. I would be all for that one...lol.

I have never understood why the execs would be getting such high pay while tehy run a company into the ground. If the company is making money it is a non-issue, but loosing billions and still getting millions a year is cray.