(Lake Martin Specific)
111,232 messages
Updated 10/28/2024 2:46:13 PM
Lakes Online Forum
84,070 messages
Updated 10/30/2024 8:48:25 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,171 messages
Updated 5/29/2024 10:51:34 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,172 messages
Updated 9/9/2024 5:04:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
Name: |
GoneFishin
-
|
|
Subject: |
For Bigot WIX Only
|
Date:
|
6/15/2020 6:48:55 PM
|
Time to update your bigotry and accept the law of the land. Bigotry has no place according your Right leaning SCOTUS.
"By a 6-3 margin, the justices ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964—a provision that bars discrimination “because of” a number of characteristics including “sex”—prohibits firing or disfavouring workers on the basis of their sexual orientation or gender identity. To the surprise of many, the majority view was penned by Justice Gorsuch."
Roberts joined Gorsuch to reach the 6-3 margin.
|
Name: |
wix
-
|
|
Subject: |
Goof-LGBTQ
|
Date:
|
6/16/2020 12:56:46 AM
|
Court didn’t say you couldn’t fire them for doin’ stupid stuff that they are best known for doin’.
|
Name: |
CRD
-
|
|
Subject: |
For Bigot WIX Only
|
Date:
|
6/16/2020 12:10:50 PM
|
Thankfully, there is a religious institution exemption, therefore, parochial schools still have the right to be, as you say, "bigoted". Let's see how long it takes the courts to rule on the exemptions. The America that I grew up in is dead.
Also, since the process of transitioning is "fluid", does this mean that a male, who transitioned to a female and then transitioned back to a male cannot be fired while a male? This crap is what you advocate for Fish?
|
Name: |
CRD
-
|
|
Subject: |
For Bigot WIX Only
|
Date:
|
6/16/2020 12:21:52 PM
|
And your statement must prove that you are not a SB owner. Otherwise you would understand that the only ones who win in these civil rights shakedowns are the shakedown attorneys. You as a SB owner that may be faced with a civil rights suit, pay exhorbitant employment fees for prevention and litigation that will not be recouped, unlike the pimp attorneys. So although you revel in this SC decision, the rest of us are left paying for Benjamin being allowed to show up for work in a dress.
|
|
|