Forum Thread
(Lake Martin Specific)
111,183 messages
Updated 6/9/2024 1:00:09 PM
Lakes Online Forum
83,672 messages
Updated 6/13/2024 1:10:14 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,197 messages
Updated 6/10/2024 5:39:11 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,171 messages
Updated 5/29/2024 10:51:34 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,170 messages
Updated 6/10/2024 6:29:37 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,977 messages
Updated 6/10/2024 6:30:23 PM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Lake Martin Photo Gallery





    
Name:   GoneFishin - Email Member
Subject:   It's Your Choice
Date:   3/7/2022 2:24:22 PM (updated 3/7/2022 2:26:43 PM)

Good reason to get vaccinated......

Choose Wisely





Name:   MartiniMan - Email Member
Subject:   Scientifically illiterate non sequiter
Date:   3/7/2022 3:00:31 PM

Goofy, unless you have been under a rock you may have missed the little factoid that the faux vaccines do not prevent transmission of the virus.  At best it may lessen symptoms but even that with the latest variant is not certain.  So no, that article does not even remotely make the case for getting the experimental gene therapies.  Literally the only reason to take a chance on them is if you are elderly and/or have two more comorbidities....and I suspect the vast majority of them already have the jab.   But it will not prevent you from being infected and if you get infected you will still risk the issues raised in the article. 

So YOUR CHOICE is whether the risk of adverse reactions from the experimental gene therapies, knowing they won't protect you from infection, is worth the reduced potential for hospitalization and death from the ChiCom virus.  If you are not elderly, obese, immunocompromised, etc. in my opinion you are crazy to take the risk.  But it's a free country so knock yourself out.....but taking advice from someone as scientifically illiterate and ill-informed (or intentionally misleading) as Goofy without at least thinking critically is indeed a BAD CHOICE.





Name:   phil - Email Member
Subject:   Thank God, there is a choice!!
Date:   3/7/2022 3:35:26 PM (updated 3/7/2022 3:50:17 PM)

https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/covid-vaccine-side-effects

 

 

Thankfully there is a choice to get it or not - Medical decisions should be between the doctor and patient - not something to be forced as we have seen for the last year under dictator Biden.

 

 

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17592-bird-flu-virus-linked-to-inflamed-brains/

link from 2009 bird flu causing inflamed brains - its nothing new that GFY is posting.  The annual flu affects people differently and you can find articles and posts refering to the long term flu fog, and in the case above brain inflamation long before Covid.  Apparently Rip Van GFY just woke up when the Covid sky was falling.

 





Name:   phil - Email Member
Subject:   Scientifically illiterate non sequiter
Date:   3/7/2022 3:38:16 PM (updated 3/7/2022 3:38:32 PM)

"Literally the only reason to take a chance on them is if you are elderly and/or have two more comorbidities..."

 

Well that or if you were in fear of losing your job for the last year because of Biden policies and his authoritarian demands.





Name:   MartiniMan - Email Member
Subject:   Thank God, there is a choice!!
Date:   3/7/2022 5:40:47 PM

If Goofy read an article that the faux vaccines kept his corn flakes from getting soggy he'd get triple jabbed and post it on the Forum.  He literally has zero critical thinking skills......they do not exist.  Anyone with a modicum of knowledge and understanding would have never in a million years tied this article to promoting the jab.  They would know that the jab doesn't prevent transmission.  It's kind of sad and more than a little pathetic.  But it does give us some cheap entertainment.





Name:   CRD - Email Member
Subject:   Maybe not
Date:   3/8/2022 10:48:32 AM (updated 3/8/2022 10:49:17 AM)

"The study offers no indication whether a Covid vaccination would mitigate the risk of such changes. The participants tested positive for the disease between March 2020 and April 2021, before the vaccines were widely available in the U.K."

 

Fish, I will give you credit for providing an interesting read, however, when the study itself discusses its limitations, may I suggest that you don't jump to conclusions prior to reading the entire paper.





Name:   GoneFishin - Email Member
Subject:   Maybe not
Date:   3/8/2022 5:55:18 PM

I leave that up to you. Thanks for your inciteful input.









Quick Links
Lake Martin News
Lake Martin Photos
Lake Martin Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.LakeMartin.com
THE LAKE MARTIN WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal