Off-Topic: LOL

Lake Martin Topics

(Lake Martin Specific)

111,146 messages

Updated 5/2/2024 12:15:00 PM

Off-Topic

Lakes Online Forum

83,609 messages

Updated 5/2/2024 5:30:02 PM

Boat Maintenance

Lakes Online Forum

5,193 messages

Updated 4/3/2024 3:47:36 AM

Lake Martin Fishing

(Lake Martin Specific)

4,169 messages

Updated 4/16/2024 3:16:57 AM

Jokes

Lakes Online Forum

4,169 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 11:05:05 PM

Sports

Lakes Online Forum

4,260 messages

Updated 3/24/2024 9:24:45 AM

Grilling & Recipes

Lakes Online Forum

2,976 messages

Updated 3/20/2024 11:53:43 PM

Lake Martin SCUBA

(Lake Martin Specific)

169 messages

Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM

Tallapoosa River Topics

Lakes Online Forum

98 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM

Forum Usage Rules

Welcome, Guest

Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]

	Name:	architect -
	Subject:	LOL
	Date:	12/8/2012 7:22:42 AM

Nice try...but biased interpretations (misinterpretation?) of "statistics" from a proudly biased source is not VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE!!.. Each month the BLS, an unbiased source whether you conspiracy nuts believe it or not, gives the stats that matter...the net gain in non-farm jobs from both public and private sector and almost every month for the last 37 months the public sector has decreased and the private sector increased. Now on a less frequent basis the BLS will present estimates of the total number of jobs in each sector at that moment in time. The two sets of statistics are NOT directly related. Now for your arithmetic lesson...explain how if the public sector jobs decreased in at 4 of the last 5 months (reference BLS not CNS) while the private sector jobs increased, how is it mathematically possible for the public sector to make up 73% of the new jobs? Well, actually it is "possible" but very very unlikely and I assure you that over the last 5 months that unlikely event did not occur. Get CNS to explain it to you!